<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1800789063490117&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Z-Wave Vs. Zigbee

Z-Wave and Zigbee are both low-power, mesh wireless technologies designed to carry small amounts of data short to medium distances. But they aren’t without their differences. We’re often asked about those differences by product designers looking to find a mesh technology for a product they’re building.

Before we get into the differences, here’s a brief rundown of what these wireless technologies have in common.

Z-Wave Vs. Zigbee: What do they have in common?

  1. Both technologies are mesh networks. Each node in the system acts as both a wireless data source and a repeater. Information from a single sensor node hops from node to node until the transmission reaches the gateway. (We’ll talk more later on whether this is the appropriate topology for your application.)
  2. Both technologies use the IEEE 802.15.4 low-rate personal area network (LR-PAN) protocol for the unified physical layer (OSI layer 1), structuring packets, and creating MAC (Medium Access Control) schemes.
  3. Both are widely used in local area sensor data networks, like in security systems, urban smart grid controllers, HVAC control systems, home automation, and lighting controls.

Z-Wave Vs. Zigbee: How are they different?

  1. Z-wave has a tightly controlled product ecosystem that caters to the smart home and smart building space, whereas Zigbee can be used for a number of applications. There’s no expectation that two Zigbee devices are interoperable unless the interoperability is preplanned. A Z-Wave application, on the other hand, will almost always integrate with another Z-Wave device. This is a major consideration for product engineers, which we’ll discuss further in the section below.
  2. Zigbee uses the global standard 2.4GHz ISM frequency band, whereas Z-Wave uses the 915 MHz ISM band (in the U.S.) and the 868 MHz RFID band (in Europe). Zigbee’s global standard allows its hardware to be used in any country. However, the 2.4 GHz band can be subject to intense interference from WiFi and Bluetooth systems, whereas the sub-GHz bands Z-Wave uses do not face the same interference issues.
  3. Lots of providers make Zigbee radios, but Z-Wave uses a proprietary radio system from Sigma designs. Since Z-Wave suffers from fewer interoperability problems than Zigbee, their proprietary radio system isn’t necessarily a bad thing.
  4. Z-Wave uses frequency-shift keyed modulation (FSK), whereas Zigbee modulation is carried out through direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS). Each has its own pluses and minuses, and you can read more here on the difference between DSSS and FSK.

Zigbee: An interoperability cautionary tale?

Zigbee is, in my opinion, a cautionary tale for wireless standard bodies. Many wireless manufacturers use Zigbee to produce devices that aren’t actually interoperable—which can cause major issues for OEMs that are expecting interoperability.

Want to find the best wireless technology for your M2M application?

Whether or not Zigbee missed an opportunity to be more like Z-Wave when it comes to interoperability is another discussion. But the question becomes, are you looking for true application interoperability—where devices work without any coordination among vendors on different parts of the stack? If that’s your goal, you’re going to lean toward a technology like Z-Wave that, while more proprietary, is very successful due to its ease of use and interoperability. If interoperability isn’t a concern, Zigbee could be a contender.

Will Zigbee Or Z-Wave Work Best For Your Application?

If you’re considering different technologies for a product you’re building, you should first be certain that a mesh topology will work for you. Mesh could be the wrong choice if you need to transmit data over long distances.

Both Zigbee and Z-Wave are, by their very nature, short to medium range. In fact, we recently spoke with some individuals at a large HVAC controls company who confessed to putting up three times more mesh node “thermostats” in a building than were needed just to make their Zigbee work. If you have a break in your mesh and have to do a workaround like this, consider the costs—they’ll add up quickly! Additionally, mesh networks have higher latencies, which can cause bottlenecks when several nodes try to pass through a single node to reach the gateway.

We don’t claim that mesh is always a bad choice—but it’s no secret we favor a star network topology. If you find that your product actually requires a long-range alternative to Zigbee or Z-Wave, take a look at Symphony Link. To see a breakdown of other long-range wireless technologies, we recommend this white paper on Selecting A Wireless Technology For Industrial IoT Products.

IoT Protocol Selection White Paper

Written by Brian Ray

Brian is the Founder and CTO of Link Labs. As the chief technical innovator and leader of the company, Brian has led the creation and deployment of a new type of ultra long-range, low-power wireless networking which is transforming the Internet of Things and M2M space.

Before starting Link Labs, Brian led a team at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab that solved communications and geolocation problems for the national intelligence community. He was also the VP of Engineering at the network security company, Lookingglass, and served for eight years as a submarine officer in the U.S. Navy. He graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy and received his Master’s Degree from Oxford University.

OTHER ARTICLES YOU MAY ENJOY

Internet of Things, M2M & IoT Applications, Wireless Technology

An In-Depth Look At IoT In Agriculture & Smart Farming Solutions

Read
Wireless Technology, Z-wave, Zigbee

Z-Wave Vs. Zigbee

Read

Want to learn more?

Looking for more information about the latest IoT technologies, like LPWAN, LoRa, M2M,
long-range wireless and more? Here are a few resources to get you started.


RESOURCES
PAGE
Range
Calculator